From no-reply@arXiv.org Thu Feb 26 20:50:07 2009 Received: from zhuangzi.site (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zhuangzi.site (8.13.8/8.13.8/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1QJo2GN029245 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:50:07 +0100 Envelope-to: wirth@logic.at Received: from mail.logic.at [128.130.175.3] by zhuangzi.site with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.5) for (single-drop); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:50:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.19]) by gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LcmDN-0004s0-Ge for wirth@logic.at; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:48:13 +0100 Received: from dspam by mx.logic.tuwien.ac.at with spam-scanned (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LcmDN-0006Fl-Fr for wirth@logic.at; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:48:13 +0100 Received: from adminapp.mail.cornell.edu ([132.236.56.29]) by mx.logic.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LcmDM-0006Ep-2E for wirth@logic.at; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:48:13 +0100 Received: from arxiv.org (arxiv1.library.cornell.edu [128.84.158.114]) by adminapp.mail.cornell.edu (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id n1QJm9iV021951 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from arxiv1.library.cornell.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by arxiv.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1QJm966016862 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:48:09 -0500 Received: (from e-prints@localhost) by arxiv1.library.cornell.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n1QJm9ol016860 for wirth@logic.at; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:48:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:48:09 -0500 Message-Id: <200902261948.n1QJm9ol016860@arxiv1.library.cornell.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: arxiv1.library.cornell.edu: e-prints set sender to no-reply@arXiv.org using -f Precedence: bulk X-Supported-By: U.S. National Science Foundation, Agreement 0132355 (7/01-6/04) From: no-reply@arXiv.org To: wirth@logic.at Subject: RE: hput arXiv.tar.gz -> 0902.4682.tar.gz (0902.4682, 1227kb) Reply-To: cs@arXiv.org X-FILTER-DSPAM: by mx.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-DSPAM-Result: Spam X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Feb 26 20:48:13 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5051 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 103 chance of being ham X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.9900 X-DSPAM-Factors: 15, to+edit, 0.99000, From*reply, 0.99000, listings, 0.99000, archives, 0.01000, Christoph, 0.01000, at+Your, 0.99000, upper, 0.01000, unlikely, 0.01000, line+so, 0.01000, unlikely+that, 0.01000, anonymous, 0.99000, OFFICIAL, 0.99000, connection+with, 0.99000, bytes, 0.01000, pride, 0.99000 To verify abstract and postscript, use http://arXiv.org/abs/0902.4682 Article-id: 0902.4682, Article password: phrwt (access still password restricted) Abstract will appear in mailing scheduled to begin at 20:00 Thursday US Eastern time (i.e., Fri 27 Feb 09 01:00:00 GMT). Your title and abstract will appear in the next mailing exactly as below. (Except possibly for the NUMBER which IS NOT OFFICIAL until the next mailing of abstracts [20:00 US Eastern time (EDT/EST) Sun - Thu] -- it cannot be used to cross-list to other archives [e.g., from cs to math or physics] until after that time.) To correct any problems, you MUST replace NOW. Replacements on the same day (until the 16:00 US Eastern time deadline Mon-Fri) do not generate a revised date line, so do not hesitate to replace submission until everything is perfect (including removal of any extraneous files). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ \\ arXiv:0902.4682 From: Claus-Peter Wirth Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:48:01 GMT (1227kb) Title: Lectures on Jacques Herbrand as a Logician Authors: Claus-Peter Wirth, Joerg Siekmann, Christoph Benzmueller, Serge Autexier Categories: cs.LO cs.AI Comments: ii + 70 pages Report-no: SEKI Report SR-2009-01 Journal-ref: Dov M. Gabbay & John Woods (eds.). 2009. Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol 5: Logic from Russell to Godel License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ \\ We give some lectures on the work on formal logic of Jacques Herbrand, and sketch his life and his influence on automated theorem proving. The intended audience ranges from students interested in logic over historians to logicians. Besides the well-known correction of Herbrand's False Lemma by Goedel and Dreben, we also present the hardly known unpublished correction of Heijenoort and its consequences on Herbrand's Modus Ponens Elimination. Besides Herbrand's Fundamental Theorem and its relation to the Loewenheim-Skolem-Theorem, we carefully investigate Herbrand's notion of intuitionism in connection with his notion of falsehood in an infinite domain. We sketch Herbrand's two proofs of the consistency of arithmetic and his notion of a recursive function, and last but not least, present the correct original text of his unification algorithm with a new translation. \\ Contains: 00README.XXX: 31 bytes KnowingUfoVisitors.eps: 1149579 bytes (looks big) %%Creator: jpeg2ps V1.9 by Thomas Merz LoewenheimSkolemHerbrand-FinalBridge.eps: 1395359 bytes (looks big) %%Creator: (ImageMagick) amsfonts.sty: 7992 bytes amssymb.sty: 15232 bytes article.cls: 19939 bytes body.tex: 257896 bytes color.cfg: 853 bytes dfki.eps: 102037 bytes dvips.def: 4987 bytes fontenc.sty: 4408 bytes graphics.cfg: 1437 bytes graphics.sty: 13694 bytes graphicx.sty: 7881 bytes headerforformulas.tex: 24663 bytes headerhot.tex: 39288 bytes headernamesrest.tex: 122369 bytes headersugarterms.tex: 1322 bytes herbrand.eps: 60548 bytes herbrandbibliography.tex: 14474 bytes ifthen.sty: 4727 bytes iu.eps: 847239 bytes (looks big) %%Creator: (ImageMagick) ju.eps: 124675 bytes keyval.sty: 2265 bytes leibniz.eps: 300218 bytes (looks big) %%Creator: (ImageMagick) macros.sty: 2961 bytes makeidx.sty: 1776 bytes named.bst: 23521 bytes named.sty: 3096 bytes pdf.ilg: 448 bytes pdf.ind: 12594 bytes pdf.tex: 175 bytes pdf.toc: 2583 bytes pstricks.con: 1543 bytes pstricks.sty: 5186 bytes pstricks.tex: 80593 bytes quotation.tex: 31107 bytes references.tex: 69184 bytes rotating.sty: 5606 bytes seki-deckblatt-3.tex: 9207 bytes seki-robbi.eps: 53021 bytes size12.clo: 8753 bytes specialfonts.tex: 18295 bytes t1enc.def: 9067 bytes t1pcr.fd: 798 bytes t1phv.fd: 1488 bytes t1ptm.fd: 774 bytes times.sty: 883 bytes trig.sty: 3152 bytes uds.eps: 411408 bytes (looks big) %%Creator: (ImageMagick) umsa.fd: 2743 bytes umsb.fd: 2743 bytes url.sty: 21092 bytes xcolor.sty: 40164 bytes Stored as: 0902.4682.tar.gz (1227kb) Warnings: Author 1: Claus-Peter Wirth Author 2: Joerg Siekmann Author 3: Christoph Benzmueller Author 4: Serge Autexier -> Number of authors = 4 arXiv.tar: unpacked 55 files from tar file REMOVED pdf.aux due to name conflict PS files: 0902.4682.ps.gz (1241kb) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Successful submission to the archives can be a significant source of pride and accomplishment. It entails many serious responsibilities: if you cannot check off on all of the items below, then you should replace your submission. (Note: *do not* resubmit, instead *replace*) ___ The Title/Author fields above are correct. ___ The abstract is complete, correct, and wrapped correctly. ___ Capitalization in title correct (we automatically lower case titles with excessive use of upper case, but we get some acronyms incorrect -- replace with uppercase letters only where they should be). ___ The authors are listed in `Firstname Lastname' order. ___ any anonymous ftp or http pointers to additional files are given in standard url format (e.g. ftp://myhost.domain/path/filename.ext or http://mywwwhost.domain/path/filename.html) ___ Periods are separated by a space from the end of any URL's ___ Any Journal-ref is a complete bibliographic reference to an already published version (includes volume and page number info in the case of a print journal). ___ All files including any figures were included. ___ This paper has not been submitted to any other arXiv.org e-print archives. ___ The full text of the paper itself is available directly from the archive. ___ The submission can be retrieved uncorrupted (TRY IT). Submitters who repeatedly leave errors uncorrected may lose submission privilege to the archives. (Replace using the current tentative paper number unless notified otherwise.) If your abstract is improperly wrapped, note that abstract linefill stops at whitespace indentation (e.g. a blank line or a line indented with space(s) denotes a new paragraph,and won't be wrapped). For further hints, keep reading or see http://arXiv.org/help/ . Guidelines for a proper title and abstract preparation are given at http://arXiv.org/help/prep . If you have not already read this, please read it now to ensure that you have followed the guidelines. It is an abuse of valuable archive admin time to edit abstracts by hand. If you need to replace this paper, then use the `replace' facility at http://arxiv.org/replace. Your entry will not officially appear in the listings until the next mailing goes out (and thus cannot yet be accessed via the search or the daily listings), and your paper number may be changed until that time, so it is necessary to wait a day before cross-listing, etc. DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION OF THIS PAPER. A resubmission is treated as a separate submission, and given a new number, which will have to be removed by hand (and could result in loss of future submission privileges). Instead use the replace facility (see http://arxiv.org/help/replace). DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION TO LIST THIS PAPER TO ANOTHER ARCHIVE within the arXiv system, since the system needs to know that it is one submission and not multiple. Instead use the cross-list facility (see http://arXiv.org/help/cross) to generate a cross-listing for it. ***NOTES*** 1) Avoid excessive cross-listings: cross-listings of a paper on archive-x to archive-y are intended for subjects of *direct* interest to subscribers of archive-y. Those subscribers of archive-y who have peripheral or direct interest in the subjects of archive-x are already subscribed to archive-x and neither need nor desire multiple receipt of the same abstract. (In particular, it is exceedingly unlikely that you could decide what is of direct interest to readers of archive-y if you yourself are not an active reader of archive-y.) 2) Common sense suggests that `replaced' papers are not immediately re-requested so if your intent is to communicate correct research it is in your interest to submit a final version in the first place, i.e. *avoid premature submissions*. If you later need to replace the submission, it would be helpful to indicate in the Comments: field (i.e. below Authors: ) how serious is the revision (e.g. v2: major conceptual changes, v3: minor grammatical changes, etc.), and include as a commented header in the revised version of the paper a guide to the changes for posterity.