Subject: RE: hput arXiv.tar.gz -> 0902.3730.tar.gz (0902.3730, 131kb)

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:45:24 -0500

To verify abstract and postscript, use http://arXiv.org/abs/0902.3730
  Article-id: 0902.3730, Article password: di2nf (access still password restricted)
 Abstract will appear in mailing scheduled to begin at 20:00 Monday
  US Eastern time (i.e., Tue 24 Feb 09 01:00:00 GMT).

Your title and abstract will appear in the next mailing exactly as below.
(Except possibly for the NUMBER which IS NOT OFFICIAL until the next mailing
of abstracts [20:00 US Eastern time (EDT/EST) Sun - Thu] -- it cannot be used
to cross-list to other archives [e.g., from cs to math or physics] until after
that time.) To correct any problems, you MUST replace NOW. 
Replacements on the same day (until the 16:00 US Eastern time deadline Mon-Fri)
do not generate a revised date line, so do not hesitate to replace submission
until everything is perfect (including removal of any extraneous files).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\\
arXiv:0902.3730
From: Claus-Peter Wirth <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:45:20 GMT   (131kb)

Title: Full First-Order Sequent and Tableau Calculi With Preservation of
  Solutions and the Liberalized delta-Rule but Without Skolemization
Authors: Claus-Peter Wirth
Categories: cs.AI cs.LO
Comments: ii + 40 pages
Report-no: Research Report 698/1998 (green/grey series), Fachbereich
  Informatik, University of Dortmund
Journal-ref: Caferra, R. and Salzer, G., eds., Automated Deduction in Classical
  and Non-Classical Logics (FTP'98), LNAI 1761, pp. 283-298, Springer, 2000
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
\\
  We present a combination of raising, explicit variable dependency
representation, the liberalized delta-rule, and preservation of solutions for
first-order deductive theorem proving. Our main motivation is to provide the
foundation for our work on inductive theorem proving, where the preservation of
solutions is indispensable.
\\

Contains:
 00README.XXX: 31 bytes
 amssymb.sty: 15232 bytes
 article.cls: 19939 bytes
 body.tex: 205286 bytes
 dina4.sty: 1336 bytes
 german.sty: 25453 bytes
 header.tex: 6838 bytes
 header12pt.tex: 3350 bytes
 headerarticle.tex: 826 bytes
 headerbiblio.tex: 12160 bytes
 headerforformulas.tex: 24663 bytes
 headerhot.tex: 39288 bytes
 headernamesrest.tex: 122312 bytes
 headerproof.tex: 806 bytes
 headersugarterms.tex: 1322 bytes
 headertheorem.tex: 6151 bytes
 makeidx.sty: 1776 bytes
 mssymb.sty: 9040 bytes
 pdf.tex: 153 bytes
 size12.clo: 8753 bytes
 specialfonts.tex: 18295 bytes
 times.sty: 883 bytes
 url.sty: 21092 bytes

Stored as: 0902.3730.tar.gz (131kb)

Warnings:

Author 1: Claus-Peter Wirth

 arXiv.tar: unpacked 23 files from tar file

PS files:
 0902.3730.ps.gz (122kb)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Successful submission to the archives can be a significant source of pride
and accomplishment. It entails many serious responsibilities: if you cannot
check off on all of the items below, then you should replace your submission.
(Note: *do not* resubmit, instead *replace*)

  ___ The Title/Author fields above are correct.
     ___ The abstract is complete, correct, and wrapped correctly.
     ___ Capitalization in title correct (we automatically lower case titles
	 with excessive use of upper case, but we get some acronyms incorrect
	 -- replace with uppercase letters only where they should be).
     ___ The authors are listed in `Firstname Lastname' order.
     ___ any anonymous ftp or http pointers to additional files are given in
         standard url format (e.g. ftp://myhost.domain/path/filename.ext
         or http://mywwwhost.domain/path/filename.html)
     ___ Periods are separated by a space from the end of any URL's
     ___ Any Journal-ref is a complete bibliographic reference to an already
         published version (includes volume and page number info in the case
         of a print journal).
  ___ All files including any figures were included.
  ___ This paper has not been submitted to any other arXiv.org e-print archives.
  ___ The full text of the paper itself is available directly from the archive.
  ___ The submission can be retrieved uncorrupted (TRY IT).

Submitters who repeatedly leave errors uncorrected may lose submission
privilege to the archives. (Replace using the current tentative paper number
unless notified otherwise.)

If your abstract is improperly wrapped, note that abstract linefill stops at
whitespace indentation (e.g. a blank line or a line indented with space(s)
denotes a new paragraph,and won't be wrapped).

For further hints, keep reading or see http://arXiv.org/help/ . Guidelines
for a proper title and abstract preparation are given at
http://arXiv.org/help/prep . If you have not already read this, please read 
it now to ensure that you have followed the guidelines. It is an abuse of 
valuable archive admin time to edit abstracts by hand.

If you need to replace this paper, then use the `replace' facility at
http://arxiv.org/replace. Your entry will not officially appear in the 
listings until the next mailing goes out (and thus cannot yet be accessed 
via the search or the daily listings), and your paper number may be changed
until that time, so it is necessary to wait a day before cross-listing, etc.

DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION OF THIS PAPER.
A resubmission is treated as a separate submission, and given a new number,
which will have to be removed by hand (and could result in loss of future
submission privileges). Instead use the replace facility (see 
http://arxiv.org/help/replace).

DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION TO LIST THIS 
PAPER TO ANOTHER ARCHIVE within the arXiv system, since the system needs 
to know that it is one submission and not multiple. Instead use the 
cross-list facility (see http://arXiv.org/help/cross) to generate a 
cross-listing for it.

***NOTES***
1) Avoid excessive cross-listings: cross-listings of a paper on archive-x to
 archive-y are intended for subjects of *direct* interest to subscribers of
 archive-y. Those subscribers of archive-y who have peripheral or direct
 interest in the subjects of archive-x are already subscribed to archive-x and
 neither need nor desire multiple receipt of the same abstract. (In particular,
 it is exceedingly unlikely that you could decide what is of direct interest to
 readers of archive-y if you yourself are not an active reader of archive-y.)

2) Common sense suggests that `replaced' papers are not immediately
 re-requested so if your intent is to communicate correct research
 it is in your interest to submit a final version in the first place,
 i.e. *avoid premature submissions*.
 If you later need to replace the submission, it would be helpful to indicate 
 in the Comments: field (i.e. below Authors: ) how serious is the revision
 (e.g. v2: major conceptual changes, v3: minor grammatical changes, etc.),
 and include as a commented header in the revised version of the paper a guide
 to the changes for posterity.